rev. 28.10.2004
General equipment is regarded as absolutely necessary to perform a fire investigation.
If you do not have this equipment available, you will probably run into severe difficulties
at the first fire ground you try to investigate. This does not mean that you will need the
equipment described here, but that you need at least some kind of it.
A lot of the statements made herein result from experiencies made the hard way,
may be they will help you to choose an easier way.
It should not be concealed, that in many cases only the purchase of the devices described here
is not sufficient for their sense-making operation. You should absolutely calculate a, sometimes considerable,
amount of time for the training of a correct, secure, and effective operation of these devices.
Computers are today so widely used and have such a broad spectrum of appliancies,
that they certainly belong into the category of general equipment. So they are
dicussed here, even if the statements made herein will be the first which are outdated,
as techniques on this sector make an extreme progress within shortest periodes.
Actual there are several platforms availabe, but by the means of
available performance and necessary costs for the most of us this number of
different platforms is greatly reduced to these computers called personal
computers. There are actually two lines of platforms available, the line of
Apple Macintosh, or Power Mac, or the line of the IBM compatible PC. As the
Mac or Power Mac is more expensive than the comparable IBM compatible PC and the
availability of application software is quite limited and always more expensive
compared to those available for the IBM compatible PC, we choose the IBM compatible
PC. We choose it though it is not the better choice from the technical point of
view and though it is not the most comfortable system. The decision was made only by
the lower price and the largely higher number of available software applications.
The lower price is an argument that is directly related to the short innovation cycles
of the computer industry. As we are forced to reinvest every two to three years
into our computer equipment to keep up with the state of the art, we try to keep
this investment as low as possible. 24524,1 hours of operation.
Meanwhile I think about purchasing an Apple Power Mac, as it has some advantages over the windows trash
that cannot longer be disregarded.The first is, that the system may be booted without the presence of a harddisk.
This means that you may get a real clean system any time you need it.
The situation has changed somewhat with the introduction of OS X. Which makes the Mac a little less attractive for me.
You should not see your computer as a black box with several in- and outlets on it's back.
Your computer is a box that can be opened and modified internal. If you made an intelligent
choice while you bougth your computer, it is normally only the mainboard and the CPU
that has to be replaced to upgrade your system to gain higher performance. All
other ingredients may regularily be kept if choosen intelligent. (Except for
some special upgrades with a single special purpose.)
There are several bus systems available on the PC market for the mainboard. The
bus system on the mainboard is significant for the extension cards used with this
mainboard. They are called ISA 8-bit or 16-bit, EISA and PCI. In the recent years there
have been others, which are today no longer of importance. The best performance
is offered by the PCI-bus, but today there are still several extension cards not
available in PCI technology, so that the preferred mainboard should at least offer
4 PCI slots and 3 ISA 16-bit slots. (The more the better, while the trend is to omit ISA slots or to
replace them by PCI slots.) Meanwhile the innovation cycles in the computer industry are so low and
have been expanded to other parts than the CPU that this is no longer true,
as many internal components are no longer capable to keep up with new bus speeds, accerleration ports,
memory requirements etc., that simple upgrades by exchanging the motherboard and CPU are no longer feasable.
The choice of the CPU is of minor importance as, sooner or later it will be replaced
by a newer one. (including the mainboard.) The steps we made: 1988: 80286, 12,5 MHz,
1 MB RAM, 65 MB HD; 1991:Notebook 80386SX, 20 MHz, 2 MB RAM, 60 MB HD; 1992: 80486, 33 MHz,
16 MB RAM, 512 MB HD; 1994: 80486, 66 MHz, 16 MB RAM, 1 GB HD; 1995: Pentium 90 MHz,
64 MB RAM, 4 GB HD; 1997: Notebook Pentium 133 MHz, 40 MB RAM, 1.2 GB HD, Pentium MMX 233 MHz,
64 MB RAM, 4 GB HD. 2002: Pentium 4 1.5 GHz, 512 MB RAM, 36 GB HD. 2003:
Harddisk capacity enhanced up to 360 GB; Notebook Pentium III 1 GHz, 40 GB HD.
Of far more importance is the choice of the bus architecture, because this determins
the choice of the extension cards used, which will regularily be kept while upgrading
the system. The PCI bus architecture is available since 1994.
The next you need is a graphics card. As this is an interface part to your eyes, you should
not try to economize in buying this. The best card you can afford is highly recommended.
It should be a PCI card, to deliver the best quality and highest speed possible. We used an ATI
Graphics Pro Turbo PCI with 4 MB VRAM. Our actual choice is the Matrox Millenium G450 DualHead 16 MB
Most mainboards do have an onboard IDE or EIDE interface. It is used to adapt IDE or
EIDE hard drives to your computer. IDE offers the possibility to join up to two hard
drives if they are compatible to each other, and EIDE offers the possibility to join
up to 4 drives if each pair of drives is compatible to each other. If you like to
avoid problems, you should forget, that you ever heard about these interfaces.
The other and far better solution to connect hard drives to your computer is an
SCSI interface card. The disadvantage of an SCSI interface card is, that you have
to pay for it. But this disadvantage minimizes as you will need this interface card
for other supplementary purposes too, as you may connect up to 15 devices of
nearly every kind imaginable. Further this makes you buy SCSI hard drives which may
be connected to every other SCSI adapter wherever it is installed. The SCSI interface
exists since the early days of personal computers and has in its newer stages allways
been downward compatible, so that you may operate a hard drive build in the late
eighties still on a today's system. This is totally different for PC architecture
dependant IDE, EIDE and Ultra-ATA interfaces. The SCSI adapter should have a BIOS integrated
which makes it possible to boot either from a hard disk or a CD-ROM drive. The best
adapter for you is the adapter supported by most operating systems and should
naturally be an SCSI-III LVD/SE PCI bus master device for best performance. Our choice has been
the Adaptec 2940 PCI. As the times are changing the new choice should be the 29160N PCI as we did, but
if you already own a 2940 or 2940-UW, do not give it away, keep it when you upgrade to a Ultra-160/320-controller.
As you have now an interface to adapt a hard drive to your computer, let's have a look
on hard drives. The best hard drive is the largest hard drive you can afford, as long
as it is an SCSI or better an Ultra 160/320 SCSI harddrive. By the time SCSI or SCSI-II harddrives are difficult to
get and now you should look for Ultra 160/320 SCSI drives for best performance. One thing to look for are connetors on
these harddrives as there are two standards available standard for normal PCs ist the 68-pin LVD/SE connector, bsides which
there is the so called SCA-connector. Harddrives equipped with 80-pin SCA connectors do not have a separate power connector,
nor do they have an SCSI-address jumper field as they are normally used in hotplug RAID-Systems where these adjustments are
made on the backplane, which makes it possible tol pull out and plug in the drives without any hassle. If you get a harddrive
with SCA-connector and you want to use it on normal SCSI-interface you will supplementary need an adapter which separates the power
and SCSI-address jumperfield. This adapter will make your drive a bit longer as it originally was and this may, depending on your
computer case and its HD-mounting possibilities, drive you into problems, so have a look at it.
20 GB is strongly recommended as minimum,
larger is better as nothing is as worse as running out of disk space while working on an
important and/or urgent project. The average access time should be less than 5 ms. A
second cirterium is the operating noise produced by the drive. The less noisier it is,
the better it is. As the hard drive is, besides the cooling fan(s) of your computer,
the noisiest part of this machine, every dB it produces more than absolutely necessary
is eating up your nerves. Our choice has been Hewlett-Packard as they offered a (good*)
quality at reasonable costs and an excellent after sales service including a 5 year
warranty. As good service is expensive, sometimes too expensive even for manufacturers like HP, especially
if product quality is degrading...,
they ceased the OEM hard drive production, so we choose as replacement a Seagate Barracuda 4.5 GB
Ultrawide-SCSI harddrive. Which we made not the best experiences with, therefore it was replaced by a
17 GB Seagate Barracuda, Actual we use Quantums (now Maxtor) Atlas 10K II and 10K IV
An other device you should consider is a CD-ROM drive, as most software packages today
are delivered on CD-ROM. To be able to install these software packages you need a CD-ROM
drive. Software stored on CD-ROM is stored on a more reliable medium than magnetic diskettes.
Today there are CD-ROM drives available that operate at 8 to 54 times the speed of a normal
audio CD-ROM drive. An important thing for selecting a CD-ROM drive is its capability
to read all different data formats available on CD-ROM including multisession and Kodak
Photo-CDs. Acceptable speeds may already be aquired by double speed drives. You should
select only SCSI devices. Forget about these drives attached to soundcards or those drives
that need special adapters which only fill up the rare slots on your mainboard and sooner
or later you will find yourself lost because of a manufacturer that no longer produces
the necessary drivers which you badly need for your new operating system.
Our choice is Toshiba as they always have been among the first to implement new
data formats into their CD-ROM drives.One thing to remark on fast CD-ROM drives. The faster they are,
the noisier they are and the longer they need to spin up. This is sometimes my 4-times drive has
already read a file before the fast (48x) drive has finished it's spin up procedure.
DVD-drives would be an excellent replacement, if they would have a common standard, but they don't have.
So I didn't buy them, as I hate (unnescessary) incompatibilities or those things as regional codes.
As these Problem have been solved meanwhile, as most are capable of handling all standards, I switched
over to DVD-Drives.
An other device that is an absolutely must for every professional computer user is
a tape streamer, as for professionals a loss of data is equal to the loss of money.
Tape streamers are used for data backup. To assure a regular backup of your data the selected
tape streamer has to be real fast. The former widely spread floppy streamers are
unacceptable as the complete backup of a 1 GB drive takes up to five or six hours
and around six tapes. The DDS-X (X is 1 to 4) DAT tape streamers are fast and offer a storage
capacity of up to 50 GB on a single tape. The complete backup of a 10 GB drive takes
up around 20 minutes. This is an acceptable value to assure regular backups. These
DAT streamers are only available as SCSI-II/III devices.
Our choice is the Hewlett-Packard HP 1533A/1599A as it has proven to be fast, (reliable*)
and silent.To improve the reliability of these products it is recommended to put them into separate housings,
so they are only turned on if they are really used and their dust inhalation by the constant ventilation is
eaqually reduced to the absolute minimum.
Meanwhile he previous passage has to be enhanced. Tapedrives, which are fast enough an can handle data capacities of
of todays hard drives are largely too expensive. Produced custumer data may be burned to CD or DVD. To secure your
systemstate it is recommended to have a bootdrive which contains nothing else but the operating system. 5 to 10 GB are largely sufficient
for such a boot patition. After the system is set up correctly, make a backup image of this boot drive and store on an other partition.
This is to my opinion the only possibility to be able to recreate in a timely and costly acceptable way.
As an outlook for the future there will be a change for the connection of devices to the next generation of
personal computers, as all the different interfaces for keyboards, mice, modems, printers etc. will be replaced
by the universal serial bus (USB), which will theoretically allow the connection of up to 128 devices to a computer.
The USB will be the future standard interface for all low to mid performance devices. You should use USB only if there
is no other economic solution. For high speed
and high performance devices there will be the firewire technology which derives from SCSI. 2,4 GHz CPUs are already
available on the market, while first laboratory CPUs are already running at 3 GHz clock speeds. Look for a frontside bus
clock speed of 400 MHHz, as on the older 133 MHz system the fastest CPU isn't worth anything.
Monitor
The Monitor is the computers interface to your eyes, therefore you should use the best one
affordable for you. Supplementary the monitor is, if choosen correct, one of the units you will
use for a long time compared to other computer equipment. A 17 inch CRT ist a must for
graphical operating systems. A 20 or 21 inch CRT is better if you have enough space for it
on your desk. The mask pitch is important. The smaller the better. 0.28 mm is the absolute maximum you
should consider. 0,25 mm is far better because it gives gives you a sharper image. Horizontal and
vertical scan frequencies should be as high as possible at the selected resolution to reduce flicker.
The higher the choosen resolution the lower are the possible scan frequencies.
As this page was written the first time, we were using an EIZO F550i 17 inch monitor which has a pitch of 0.28 mm, horizontal scan frequency
from 30kHz to 65 kHz and a vertical scan frequency from 55 Hz to 90 Hz which are reduced at
the choosen resolution of 1024 dot x 768 lines to 59 kHz horizontal and 72 Hz vertical.
At the time the monitor was purchased (1992) these values were good. Today these values should be regarded
as an absolute minimum and are far away from what we would name excellent. Sony also produces
excellent devices, as far as you disregard the low cost products, they offer also. Our Eizo F550i finally ceased operation
on christmas 1998 after ca. 27000 hours of operation. All began with the loss of the red beam, followed one week later by the loss of the blue beam and
the electronic frontpanel control functions, which was folled two hours later by the loss of the green beam, which resulted
in a black screen. As prices for monitors have decreased enormous, a repair of that monitor would not have been
economical, so I decided to replace this monitor by a 19"-monitor. I have chosen the Sony GDM 400 PST as it offered
sufficient performance at a considerable low price. (I payed half the price as I had to pay for the 17" Eizo in 1992). The
technical data are not extreme but sufficient. Aperture grille pitch 0.25 to 0.27 mm, max. resolution 1600 dots by 1200 lines,
deflection frequencies: Horizontal: 30 to 94 kHz, vertical: 48 to 160 Hz, power consumtion 125 W, TCO95, three selectable
color temperatures, Energy Star compliant as well as NUTEK.A big disadvantage, I discovered in 2002 is the electrical design.
Line filters are build in before the main power switch which results in 38 VA reactive load even if switched off. This idiotic
design makes these devices unusable as master for master-slve power bars and makes it necessary to to plug them into a
switchable power bar to deenergize them completely. The responsible development engineers should be sent to jail for this.
As today 18 inch LCD-Monitors become affordable, this is a real alternative, but before buying such a device you should plug it into
a power outlet (of course turned off) via a varmeter...
Printer
The output produced by your printer is what your clients will get from you and reflects optical something
of the quality of your work. Therefore your printer should deliver constant good readable prints at low cost.
Needle printers are not capable to fullfill this duty. Inkjet printers may produce a constant good quality, but
to achieve this quality they need special coated papers. These special papers and the ink cartridges are
expensive. Supplementary most inkjets are GDI printers which use resources of the computer. This makes print jobs
slow. So these printers may only be used effective for special purposes as for example photorealistic color prints.
For the all day b&w printouts the best solution is a laser printer. They use ordinary copy papers which are cheap. Regulary
they are equipped with their own memory, so the jobs once sent to the printer are treated without an intervention of
the computer itself which reduces the printout time. Since 1991 we are using an HP LaserJet III. HP's LaserJets are
a good solution, because of their high endurance and their availabilty of drivers for practially every environment.
In 1996 we purchased an Epson Stylus Pro which is a high resolution (720 x 720 dpi) color inkjet printer for
photorealistic color printouts. The new generation of Epson color inkjet printers offers a resolution of up to
1440 x 1440 dpi, certainly something worth to have an eye on it. Finally you should look for a power switch on the printer of your choice, as
many manufacturers today -even HP- tend to forget to install these power and money saving devices in some of their
products.
Finally in the summer of 2001 the Epson Stylus has been retired, still fully funcional. I couldn't stand it any more to wait several minutes for a photo to be finished,
then to see that somthing in the setup has been overseen, as it couldn't be adjusted permanently, things as the resolution to be used and the paper
to be used etc. this behaviour was extremely nasty, as these errors made it necessary to start a new printout and again you hd to wait several
minutes for the next printout. Further you had to have a special coated paper in stock, only small quantities as the paper is
sensitive to humidity.
This all had an end with the purchase of a color laser printer. An extremly heavy unit, though it is not equipped with a duplex unit.
It is an HP Color LaserJet 4500. Equipped with 32 MB memory HP PCL 5c and Postscript II. The warmup lasts nearly 5 minutes,
this isn't a printer for printing 'on the fly'. Therefore it is recommended to have an other laser printer for the fast b&w printouts.
An ideal task for my old LaserJet III, which is now working for ten years to my full satisfaction. The HP CLJ 4500 has implemented Postscript II,
which is not capable to print the €-symbol. The newer HP CLJ 4550 has implemented Postscript III which seems to be the only difference of
these two models. PCL 5(c) may print the €-symbol without problems. Postscript II has to be switched to graphic printout in the driver,
which makes the €-symbol also printable.
Both printers are now operated via an external print server (HP JetDirect X500) which supports up to tree printers. This frees up parallel ports on the computers and makes
and makes it possible to print from every computer in the network without having to start the computer to which the Printers have been attached before.
Scanner
A scanner is a really useful device if you want to get images and text into your computer without having to generate
them yourself on your computer. Hand held scanners are toys for hobby use. The professional scan starts whith a flatbed
scanner. If you want to invest your money into a scanner, you should look for a color scanner. Current flatbed color
scanners offer resolutions from 300 dpi up to 1200 dpi. For general purposes a 400 to 600 dpi color scanner offers enough
resolution to stress your hard disk, as high resolutions produce huge files. Higher resolutions may be achieved with
high resolution drum scanners. These are largely too expensive for office use. We use an HP ScanJet IIc, which offers
resolutions of 300 and 400 dpi.
An other type of scanner is the film scanner. These scanners offer resolutions from 2000 to 5400 dpi and are
used to scan diapositives and negatives directly from 35mm film. Manufacturers that produce such scanners are Kodak, Nikon,
Polaroid and Microtek. The achieved quality varies greatly from manufacturer to manufacturer. The best results are achieved
by Kodak and Nikon, but their scanners are quite expensive. New products are available from Canon, Minolta and Olympus and
these are located on the lower end of the price scale and are suited for 35mm film and, except the QS35 from Minolta, the
advanced photo system (APS). As we do not need a device for the new APS format, we choose the
QS35 from Minolta which offered the highest resolution at its time. It offers a resolution of up to 2850 dpi. It is suitable for b&w negative and positive and
color negative and positive 35 mm film. The results are of an acceptable quality. The color adjustment needs a bit of
experience, but once adjusted the results are very good. The scanner is fast, but the transfer of the scanned image to the
hard disk takes up some time too, depending on the resources of your computer. 60 MB free hard diskspace is an absolute minimum.
Scanned at full resolution an image has more than 20 MB. The scanner is delivered complete with
SCSI-I/II-cable, SCSI-II-terminator and utility software. Active termination may be selected.
A disadvantage of the QS 35 is the strange driver support policy by Minolta. Windows ME and Windows 2000 are not supported, because
as theses operating systems did not exist in the active production time of this product. In other words, you will not get any driver support
for their products that have been discontinued. It's up to you to decide wether you want to invest in relative expensive products sold under such
consumer user unfriendly support policy. Their actual top model is the Scan Elite 5400. As the name says: 5400 dpi optical resolution at a
color depth of 16 bit per channel. A real fine instrument.
Modem / ISDN / DSL-adapter or DSL-router
Modems and ISDN adapters are used to connect your computer to the world (e.g. phone line). Probably you've already heard
about the term 'speed kills'. This is not true for data communications, where there is no danger in speed. For data communications
speed is not replaceable by anything, except by more speed. As speed reduces online times, which saves money.
A short history of our equipment:
In 1988 we started data communication with an 2400 bps acoustic coupler which lasted only for two months because of constant
connection failures. Then we purchased a 2400 bps Discovery modem without data compression and without error correction. This gave
us more stable connections with up to 190 characters per second (cps), but as it had no error correction the line noise still led
too often to transmission failures. Therefore this modem was, after some months, replaced by a 2400 bps Discovery modem with MNP4
error correction and MNP5 data compression with up to 240 cps. As the possible transmission speed stressed our phone bill, this
modem was replaced in 1989 by a USRobotics Dual Standard with 9600/9600 bps symetrical V.42 error correction or 14400/300 bps
asymetrical HST protocol with up to 1150 cps. This modem lasted for two years before it was replaced in 1991 by a newer USRobotics Dual
Standard which offered 14400 bps full duplex connections with V.42bis data compression with up to 1650 cps.
In 1993 we added an ISDN line with an external ISDN adapter EEH Elink 301 with 64000 bps which achieves transmission speeds up to
7000 cps. Due to the incompatibility of the european (64 kbps) and american (57.6 kbps) ISDN systems this speed could only be used
on inner european connections. So in 1995 our USRobotics Dual Standard 14400 was replaced by the new USRobotics V.Everything 28800.
This modem should have been able to achieve up to 3000 cps, but on transatlantic lines it couldn't even connect to other V.34 modems.
May be this could be changed by a new firmware for the modem but with the appearance of an affordable ISDN access to the internet in
late 1995 the need of transatlantic connections has been greatly reduced. Nevertheless the five years between 1988 and 1993 gave us
an increase of more than 3600 % in speed. Ported to cars this would mean that the 1988 Porsche which made 150 mph could have run in
1993 at 5400 mph. But to be serious this would be dangerous.
Since 2001 we use a DSL connection which, for the first time made the internet usable. Several hours lasting downloads belong now to the past.
Nothing to add.
Hardware Defects
Hardware failures are to our experience extremly rare. Here is a listing of all hardware failures we encountered since we use computers (1988):
My PC built in january 1995 as Pentium 90, upgraded in July 1997 to Pentium 233 MMX shows actual (16.08.2001) on its counter
DOS is a single task 16 bit operating system and at the time largely outdatet as it is not
capable to use the performance of todays Intel platforms. So it isn`t further
discussed here. (Though it is still needed for some low level tasks which cannot be done with the
more advanced operating systems as for example flashing Adaptecs SCSI-Interfaces.)
As Windows 3.1 is only a 16 bit enhancement (graphical user interface) to the DOS
platform the same applies to it. Nevertheless if you own a running Windows 3.1 system,
keep it. Don't try to update it to Windows 95 as long as you are not familiar with
computers. The combination DOS / Windows 3.1 grants you control to everything on your
computer.
This is completely different with Windows 95. It offers you a lot of fine functionalities,
but it enables you and your software to crash your system in a way that makes it impossible
to recover without reformatting your hard disk! This 'feature' makes it absolutely necessary
to keep up with your backups. (A usable backup software isn't contained in the package, so
it's up to you to buy one.)
With Windows NT Microsoft offers you the unequalled opportunity to buy more problems for more
bucks. (Special offer for those who have more spare nights.) Once you solved all the problems, you
will have a more reliable system. If you need a server system for your Windows network, you may find
a certain need for it. By the time Windows NT will replace the Windows 9X systems, probably from version
6.0 on, as Windows 98 will be the last version of the Windows 9X series.
Windows 2000 finally convinced me that there must be an other solution. Being a technical overkill (the operationg system
needs 750 MB disk space), it has kept most of problem producing techniques as modifying itself at boot up and shut down
(you cannot use this operating system from a write protected disk) and kernel patching while installing software enhancements.
Certainly it is more stable, but it has a lot of problems with not available driver software and supplemental it is for example
not able to correctly operate my old HP LaserJet III. Since the beginning all MS operating systems were able to handle this printer,
Windows 2000 is the first that isn't. After start up before a submitted print job is executed, it prints an 'E' on the upper left corner
of a new sheet and then sends a form feed. Microsoft was not able to fix this problem. admittedly paper is not too expensive, but this
behaviour is extremly nasty. My tv card could be used, but the start up of the program lasted over 6 Minutes. Finally my
Minolta flmscanner was still useable under Windows 2000, but a scan at full resolution took more than 30 minutes instead of 60 seconds
under Windows 95/98. Six weeks after installation I decided to remove Windows 2000. This decision made me have a new experience.
To remove Windows 2000 I had to low level format my disks, as otherwise FDISK of the other (older) operating systems is incapable
to repartition these disks....
Windows XP doesn't exist for me. (But as far as I've seen they've added some new errors to the old ones, found and created new places to hide them,
changed the color a bit, and still only want your best - your money.)
If you don't like application software, OS/2 is the probably the best solution for you.
Most DOS programs run in a DOS-box and you can open as much DOS-boxes as you like.
A real multitasking operating system, sometimes difficult to install, sometimes
completely rejected by some platforms. (I own such a platform.)
IBM promised me to give me a workaround solution in 1994. I'm still waiting for this
solution. The number of available application software packages is greatly reduced compared
to Windows, MacOs or Linux.
Linux is a freeware unix operating system. Something for real cracks. For those
who are used to work on unix machines something delicious. Novices should calculate
several years of work until they are able to master this operating system.
As meanwhile new distributions exist, which are able to install complete running systems
without user intervention, is has become a lot easier. So my systems now have a linux partition
to be able to try out Linux and to get finally an alternative to Microsoft. Linux is less expensive,
more powerful and offers better security but it is not so smooth as Windows and still a bit strange.
Que sera, sera...
Software
Operating System
DOS
Windows 95 enables your system to multitasking. Once you're used to use multitasking you
can no longer imagine how it was possible to live without it.
If you look into the documentation of your W95 package, you will probably not remark that you bought
a trial and error thing. Reading what Microsoft calls documentation, you might believe
that there are no errors and traps at all and the operatings system performs its duty
under all circumstances on all platforms. This is far away from reality. Thank you Bill for
these lots of sleepless nights, I wouldn't have known what to do with all that time...
Once you know how to walk around most of all these little nice holes, and you no longer stumble into
them, you'll have a quite good thing that operates your computer and offers you a base
for practically every imaginable application.
This was definitely the last Microsoft product I bought. Themore as Microsoft introduces along with is XP series of products the need to register
the software on ervery new hardware or sometimes even at some hardware changes. This is an extremely annoying behaviour which will never be accepted by me.
so, Microsofts XP product do not exist for me.
Application Software
Something General
Beware of software packages that use dongles. Dongles are a kind of copy protection. This is a
piece of hardware plugged into one of the interfaces of your computer. Further it is for the user
a superflue piece of hardware, which may be defective or which eventually interferes with other
products used in or with your computer. Supplementary you, as user, have to pay for this superflue
piece of hardware. If every software package that is installed on my computer would be 'protected'
by a dongle, I would have to buy a new office where I could place my computer with a
3-meter-dongle-chain plugged into its back. Nice imagination.
Word Processing Software
The simplest word processor is better than any typewriter. You will need a word processor
to produce your reports. More advanced products will give you more possibilities in the
variation of possible output styles and comfort in use. There are several good products on
the market. Which one to use depends on your personal preferences. A more sophisticated possibility
to produce your reports is a desktop publishing software. It is more difficult to learn to use this
kind of software, but it offers you more degrees of freedom in what you may produce.
We use Adobe's PageMaker. A professional dtp product which offers nearly all imaginable
possibilities, but its full usage needs some basic knowledge in the printing profession.
Spread Sheet Calculation Software
This is a versatile utility which makes it easy to create tables that may contain calculations.
It is even usable for small databases. If you get used in using this kind of software, you may
even use it for your complete bookkeeping. We use Microsoft's Excel for this purpose.
Image Processing Software
If you want to treat images with your computer to print them into your reports or to publish them
on the internet you will need an image processing software. Something essential for image processing
are the possibilities to cut images, change their enlargement, and the possible conversion of their
storage formats. The more formats are supported the better it is. necessary formats for input and
output are .tif, .bmp, .pcx, .gif, and .jpg. We use Adobe's PhotoShop.
Optical Character Recognition (OCR)
OCR software is needed to transform scanned images of text pages into a text format that can be treated
by your word processing software, so it is not necessary to retype text found in printed format.
Essential for this kind of software is a very high degree of character recognition of around 99% and more, as
otherwise the necessary effort to correct the results is higher than to retype the text.
For this task we use Caere's OmniPage Professional.
Sketching Software
To produce sketches of fire scenes you do not need a fully blown CAD software, but we did not find a solution,
that offers all what's necessary in one package. So we use Autodesk's AutoSketch for technichal drawings. We found it
to be a very cost effective solution, even if it is sometimes uncomfortable and difficult to use. The original package may be
enhanced by several symbol bibliotheques, but the use of these bibliotheques is not very comfortable.
An other solution seems to be InterGraph's Imagineer Technical. This software package is extremly easy to use. It is not a full blown CAD-software,
but it offers all functions needed for 2D drawings. The price of this package is tremendous, and not comparable to AutoSketch.
We tested the tryout version, which they say, is fully functional, but limited to a 30-day-use. As I like to take things to the limit,
I succeeded to crash the software after 3 hours, but as I said, I took it to the limits, and the situation that lead to the crash
should be no real limit for the normal use. A more serious problem is that the so called symbol bibliotheques are only accessible
via an integrated html-browser and I did not succed in using, or better said accessing these symbol bibliotheques, and this is
a real limitation. The more as the browser window is integrated into the standard drawing window and if you, like me, have only
a 17-inch-monitor, this makes the reading of the browser window contents more than uncomfortable (as far as you are able to
access the symbol bibliotheques). The conclusion for the moment is: Far too expensive for the limitations encountered, but certainly
worth to have an eye on future versions.
For most other purposes we use an old version of Corel Draw, even if we think that this is not a good solution, as
Corel has added so much unnescessary things to this software, which only fills up your hard disk.
A better solution would probably be Adobe's Illustrator.
Internet Browser
As you read these pages, you already have an internet browser. This software is needed to display HTML-,
JavaScript-, and Java code on your computer. We use Netscape's Navigator. The difference between the Navigator
and the Navigator Gold is, that the Gold edition includes an HTML-Editor. Netscapes new product
Communicator seems to be a practical demonstration of how to develop a nearly perfect software to a
featurism overcharged badly designed monster software package, which offers no significant advantages to the user.
(15.7 MB now instead the 5.3 MB of the old product)
Rapid changes in the online sector made it necessary to upgrade via Communicator 4.72 to Navigator 6.23.
Backup Software
Backup software is used to create backups of the software on your hard drive(s) to a tape drive. As you always carry
a certain risk to loose data stored on your hard drive(s) due to a head crash, virus infection or other
technical inconveniencies as operator errors, or game installing kids, it is strongly recommended to make backup copies of
your data. This should be done periodically in such a manner, that in case of a total loss of your hard drive(s) the work necessary
to recover the lost data is minimal. A total backup should be performed every week, incremental backups should
be made daily. So the maxium loss would be the work of a single day. This sounds simple, but in reality this is
a hardly to fulfil requirement. So a more practicable advice is do it as often as possible, but do it under all
circumstances before you do something dangerous as installing new software, this gives you the opportunity to recover
to the state before you began the installation procedure. Just in case the installation procedure fails, or does
something harmful to your system. The only acceptable backup software is a software which makes it possible to start
from scratch. This means a new empty hard disk is installed in your computer. To boot the system
you need a diskette with the possibility to access your tape drive and to copy the whole system from your backup tape
to your hard disk. Any other solution is inacceptable. There are only two backup software packages I know about which are
able to do this on a Windows 95 system one is Cheyenne's ArcSolo. The operator interface of this software is incredible uncomfortable
and difficult to understand, but at the time we purchased it there was no other solution available. For example the error messages are
comparable to the following situation: You turn the starter key of your car. Then there is a voice telling you:
'The gas in the tank of your car is inadequate to power the engine', instead of telling you that there is no gas
left in the tank.
A new software package is now available from Seagate, BackupExec. A real great software. Low priced, easy to use and of excellent
functionality. The software allows crash recovery of a W95-system from a startup diskette, or better said from two startup diskettes,
but if you know how to prepare a startup dikette with minimum environment, all necessary files to boot the system and to access the
streamer fit on a single 1,44 MB diskette, which does not need to be updated for every backup as with ArcSolo.
If you are using Windows 2000, you don't need to purchase BackupExec, as it is already integrated in Windows 2000.
Seagate sold the BackupExec project to an other enterpise of which I do not remember its name, but I remember ver very bad experience
with them. As I ordered Windows 2000, I ordered also BackupExec for NT, which was extremely expensiv. I tried to install BackupExec to my new
Windows 2000 system and I got only the message 'This software is not made for Windows 2000. Installation aborted.' So I called the manufacturer
and they refused to exchange the newly bought BackupExec NT version against a working Windows 2000 version. So I was forced to return the package
to my dealer with the comment 'Doesn't work and the support doesn't work also, so I'd prefer to get my money back'.
Utility Software
To maintain your system you will need some utilities. Three of the most important utilities for Windows 95 will be discussed here.
First there are the Norton Utilities for Windows 95. Though this product is maintained by Symantec and I generally dislike Symantec
products because of their installation behaviour, this is a very good selection of enhancements and maintenance tools for your operating
system. I only use two of the utilities contained therein. First this is SpeedDisk, which is the full blown version of the W95 Diskdefragmenter
and the DiskDoctor which is an alternative to the W95 Scandisk.
Second there is Quarterdeck's CleanSweep. CleanSweep is a deinstallation tool which includes an installation monitor and allows you to completely
remove software packages which have been installed while CleanSweep monitored them. This includes all Registry entries. It allowes you
to find identical files that are stored on your computer in different directories. It can find program files which are no longer needed.
Consequent application of CleanSweep saves disk space and helps you keeping your Registry File as small as possible.
A good and safe tool. A problem exists after the installation of CleanSweep 3.07 if you use Adobe's PhotoShop and/or Netscape's Navigator, as
plugins will no longer work. This problem was corrected with version 3.08. If you use the version 3.07 you should kill the task csinject.
For a final solution rename the file CSINJECT.EXE, so it cannot be started. CSINJECT is only used to speed up some functions of CleanSweep, but its
cancellation does not degrade the functionality of CleanSweep.
We ceased the use of all these cleaning and repair tools. Therefore we install from time to time a clean backup of the system. This is less expensive and
more effective.
The third thing is a 32-bit-editor. UltraEdit32 is a professional 32-bit-ASCII/hex-editor from Ian D. Mead. It is a low price high end product,
distributed as shareware. This editor allows long file names. It can be configured to what ever you like. It may be a programmers tool for
every programming language, it may be used as html-editor (the pages you actually read have been created using this editor), it is a full
replacement for Notepad, which has too many limitations. I will not miss it anymore.
A nice internet utility ís WebWasher from Siemens, this utility skips the download of unwanted advertising banners and popup windows while you are online.
I use this tool with growing fascination, as it saves a lot of time. (Freeware for private use).
More specialized software for fire investgators will be discussed in the special equipment section.
On many locations you will need portable lighting, as on most fire scenes there is
no electricity available. Even at daylight conditions you will find it useful to have
a portable electric torch available. There are a lot of inexpensive products available
on the market. Most of them are not adequete for the use in fire scenes as they are not
waterproof, not robust enough and the bulbs and reflectors installed are of poor quality.
Electric torches used by fire investigators will become dirty as their operators too, so
there is sometimes a need of cleaning them both, investiators and torches. This makes it necessary that these devices
are absolutely waterproof. Often they will get in hard contact to concrete, wooden or
metal structures which makes a certain robustness highly desirable. Then there are their
illuminating characteristics. These seem to be the highest challenge for most manufacturers
as even in torches of a general good quality and adequate pricing you will generally find
really poor illumination characteristics. Good illumination is charcaterized by equal
brightness over the whole projection field. To achieve this a special reflector is needed.
You may find these reflectors in video lighting equipment, but in general these are not
waterproof nor are they robust enough.
Torches of general good quality are made by MAG INSTRUMENT, Ontario, CA, USA, they meet all of our needs,
except for the illumination characteristics which are only poor (for fire investigation purposes). We use several of them.
The best item we found on the market comes from the finish manufacturer INSMAT ELEKTRO, Helsinki who produces
a series of torches called MICA IL (former RK). Various types from 3 to 30 watts, some with controlable brightness (half and full),
three different reflectors, and even two EX-protected versions are available and a version with power failure
automatic, where the lamp is turned on if a power failure occurs. The most important
disadvantage is, they are extremely expensive. We use an IL-60 equipped with controlable 20 watt bulb and
a reflector no. 3 (flood), which gives a bright smooth flood light. As the endurance of this light source is limited
to about 1.5 hours due to its high output power, the optional car charger unit is absolutely necessary, as the accumulator pack
is not interchangeable on the fly. This charger unit is equipped with a low voltage protection for the car battery. A disadvantage
of the charger unit is, that only standard and no rapid charging is available. Only minor changes have been made
between the older RK and the newer IL series. As the german distributor was not able to send us
pictures of the new IL series, here are pictures of the former RK series.
The former ex-protected version RK-80. . . . . . The former standard RK50, both with charger.
Drawing of the RK series.
Base
At least you should have a telephone and a fax available at your office. Most of the following
applies only to Europe or to be more precise to Germany as I'm only familiar to
the situation in this country. For your telephone and fax you may choose between
several solutions. Presumed you already have a telephone line, you may connect a
telephone and fax combination to this line. This is probably the fastet and cheapest
way to upgrade to fax capabilities and as as a surplus most of these combinations
include also an answering machine. But there are some disadvantages build into this
solution: While you're receiving or transmitting a fax you're unable to use your
telephone. The fax machines integrated into these combinations are very simple and
limited in their capabilities and most of them use thermosensitve fax paper which is
not suitable for conservation of the documents received, therefore it seems strongly
recommended to get a separate line for your fax and a machine which offers some comfort
in operation and which produces its output on normal paper. The disadvantage of this
solution is the certainly higher price for the basic equipment and supplemental you
will have to pay for a second line. This, paying for a second line, offers you a new
possibility. Instead of paying the bill for two analogue lines, you may get an ISDN
line for nearly the same price. The ISDN line offers you via two wires two channels
which may be used simultaneous and you will get three phone numbers which may be used in different
ways. For example you may use one of these numbers as your buisness phone number,
the second for your fax and the third as a private number or for a modem. The next
advantage of ISDN comes up with data transfer, as ISDN offers higher transfer speeds
and much more reliable connections as those via modems. Finally you may get more phone
numbers if you need them, up to eight if necessary. So far for the basic needs.
Practical all makes may be choosen, depending on your needs in operational comfort. But
be aware of modern remote configurable switchboard systems, under certain conditions they may be used by hackers
to perform phone calls on your bill, as far as they handle more than one phone line.
(standard for ISDN systems)
Mobile
As fire investigator you will be often outside your office, so a mobile phone would be
an ideal extension to your communications equipment. For pan european use the GSM standard
is recommended, this means for Germany the D-net sevices. If you live and work mostly in urban
regions a handy may be a suitable solution, but if you live on the country side you should
prefer a car mounted device as these usually have a higher transmitter output power (8 watts)
compared to the 2 watts of a handy this will give you better connections even in difficult
landscapes with lower coverage of relay stations as well as a car mounted aerial will
result in higher sensitvity of your receiver. If you intend to purchase such devices, you should
know that there are differencies between these devices even within a series of one single
manufacturer. These differencies result from normal fabrication tolerances, but they may have
an incredible impact on the performance of these devices. So if possible before you purchase
your device you should test it's performance. Move it or if possible several units to a location
of which you know that it has poor connection conditions, for example inside buildings, try to
establish a connetion to the relay. Some will connect, others won't. Those which do connect, will
only send an alive signal to the relay from time to time. Those wich are not able to establish
a connection will constantly search for a relay, so the transmitter operates constantly and
exhausts your power source, which results in greatly reduced standby times of the unit per charge
while you're unable to use the phone.
I use an old french ALCATEL 9109 DA car mounted unit from 1993, which is out of production for several years
now, but it has an extemely high (military like) quality standard, operating problems in the past
resulted only from the service providers card. Service for ALCATEL products is difficult to get in Germany,
because they have outsourced their service. Whether this is a good practice from the customers point of view,
is highly questionable.The hand held mobile phone I use is an Ericsson GH 337 which is also out of production now, but has an equal good
quality standard. No problems occurred since 1994 and therefore no service experiences up to now.
I avoid the use of the hand held mobile phone where ever it is possible, due to the possible health risks.
The worse things are, you have to work on, the better the tools must be to to reach
your aims. So you should try to get a selction of high quality tools. Most of the low
priced sets offered on the market are not suitable, as these tools regularly fail, if
you need them most. So you should consider that high quality tools will cost you twice
or even three times the price of that what is offered as good or industrial quality
throughout most supermarkets. Supplementary you should look for a possibilty of storage
and transportation of these tools that makes it easy to see if the set is complete, as
it is an extraordinary easy task to loose or forget some of your expensive tools in fire
places. Further big cable cutters for soft metals and medium bolt cutters for hard alloys
and some insulated tools for work on hot electrical equipment are sometimes needed as well
as a simple iron saw.
Without exception we use Gedore tools, one of Germany's best manufacturers of tools, and these only from the highest quality range available from this manufacturer. Since 1970 we only had some minor losses due to tool failure with several hundred tools in use.
Return to top of pageIngenieurbüro Frank Markmann
Gottfried-Blum-Weg 4
D-88639 Wald
Germany
Phone: +49-(0)-7578-933141
Fax: (on request)